(registered 2026-10-13, last updated 2026-10-13) Scheme name: ord Status: provisional Applications/protocols that use this scheme name: Client applications that resolve human-readable on-chain names to blockchain-inscribed content ("1Sat ordinals" model on BSV), including the ORDnet web3 browser, the ORD/plug wallet extension and mobile wallets, and indexers/search services implementing ODNCA standards. "ord" is a content locator: it dereferences a name (mutable reference, per the adopted scheme specification ODNCA-STD-005) or a 64-hex txid (immutable reference) to inscribed content. It does not initiate payments or other actions; action-oriented companion schemes are registered separately (see sns, opns, ordmail below). Contact: Alexander Taytelbaum, ODNCA — ORDnet Decentralized Names Coordination Authority, info&odnca.org Change controller: ODNCA (odnca.org) References: - ODNCA-STD-005 "URI Schemes" v1.0 (adopted scheme specification) — https://odnca.org/docs/ODNCA-STD-005-URI-Schemes.pdf - ODNCA-STD-003 "SNS-NAME-1 - Name Format Standard" — https://odnca.org/docs/ODNCA-STD-003-SNS-NAME-1.pdf - ODNCA-STD-011 "WEB3-ACTIONS-1 - The URI Scheme Family" (successor specification, public draft v0.5) — https://odnca.org/docs/ODNCA-STD-011-WEB3-ACTIONS-1.pdf Scheme syntax: ord://[/] (name form — mutable reference) ord://[/] (txid form — immutable; vout defaults to 0) The authority is a naming-system identifier: with exactly one dot it is an SNS name per ODNCA-STD-003; without a dot it is an OpNS name. UTF-8 throughout, no whitespace or control characters. is an optional slash-prefixed route within the named site; an absent path is equivalent to "/". Resolution is performed against on-chain state; no DNS interaction occurs at any point. Scheme semantics: per ODNCA-STD-005 §4 — the name form loads the content currently coupled to the name (the coupling follows the name); the txid form always loads that exact inscription. Encoding considerations: the authority component carries UTF-8 names; percent-encoding per RFC 3986 applies. No IDNA/punycode processing — names are not DNS labels. Interoperability considerations: the scheme deliberately does not resolve via DNS; applications unaware of it treat it as an unknown scheme per RFC 3986. No default port. Security considerations: resolution depends on the client's view of on-chain state; clients SHOULD verify name-holder bindings against a committed state (ODNCA commit chain) rather than trust a single index. Dereferencing "ord" URIs never initiates payments or signing operations. Visually confusable Unicode names carry the usual homograph risks; client display policies apply.