Path Computation Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers
Created
- 2008-12-19
Last Updated
- 2026-08-06
Available Formats
PCEP Messages
Reference
- RFC 5440: Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)
Available Formats
| Range | Registration Procedures |
|---|---|
| 0-251 | IETF Review |
| 252-255 | Experimental Use |
| Value | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Reserved | RFC 5440 |
| 1 | Open | RFC 5440 |
| 2 | Keepalive | RFC 5440 |
| 3 | Path Computation Request | RFC 5440 |
| 4 | Path Computation Reply | RFC 5440 |
| 5 | Notification | RFC 5440 |
| 6 | Error | RFC 5440 |
| 7 | Close | RFC 5440 |
| 8 | Path Computation Monitoring Request (PCMonReq) | RFC 5886 |
| 9 | Path Computation Monitoring Reply (PCMonRep) | RFC 5886 |
| 10 | Report | RFC 8231 |
| 11 | Update | RFC 8231 |
| 12 | LSP Initiate Request | RFC 8281 |
| 13 | StartTLS | RFC 8253 |
| 14-251 | Unassigned | |
| 252-255 | Experimental Use | RFC 8356 |
PCEP Objects
Reference
- RFC 5440: Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)
- RFC Errata 4956
Available Formats
| Range | Registration Procedures |
|---|---|
| 0-247 | IETF Review |
| 248-255 | Experimental Use |
| Object-Class Value | Name | Object-Type | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Reserved | 0-15: Reserved | RFC 5440; RFC Errata 4956 |
| 1 | OPEN | 0: Reserved | RFC 5440; RFC Errata 4956 |
| 1: Open | RFC 5440 | ||
| 2-15: Unassigned | |||
| 2 | RP | 0: Reserved | RFC 5440; RFC Errata 4956 |
| 1: Request Parameters | RFC 5440 | ||
| 2-15: Unassigned | |||
| 3 | NO-PATH | 0: Reserved | RFC 5440; RFC Errata 4956 |
| 1: No Path | RFC 5440 | ||
| 2-15: Unassigned | |||
| 4 | END-POINTS | 0: Reserved | RFC 5440; RFC Errata 4956 |
| 1: IPv4 addresses | RFC 5440 | ||
| 2: IPv6 addresses | RFC 5440 | ||
| 3: IPv4 | RFC 8306 | ||
| 4: IPv6 | RFC 8306 | ||
| 5: Generalized Endpoint | RFC 8779, Section 2.5 | ||
| 6-15: Unassigned | |||
| 5 | BANDWIDTH | 0: Reserved | RFC 5440; RFC Errata 4956 |
| 1: Requested bandwidth | RFC 5440 | ||
| 2: Bandwidth of an existing TE LSP for which a reoptimization is requested | RFC 5440 | ||
| 3: Generalized bandwidth | RFC 8779, Section 2.3 | ||
| 4: Generalized bandwidth of an existing TE-LSP for which a reoptimization is requested | RFC 8779, Section 2.3 | ||
| 5-15: Unassigned | |||
| 6 | METRIC | 0: Reserved | RFC 5440; RFC Errata 4956 |
| 1: Metric | RFC 5440 | ||
| 2-15: Unassigned | |||
| 7 | ERO | 0: Reserved | RFC 5440; RFC Errata 4956 |
| 1: Explicit Route | RFC 5440 | ||
| 2-15: Unassigned | |||
| 8 | RRO | 0: Reserved | RFC 5440; RFC Errata 4956 |
| 1: Recorded Route | RFC 5440 | ||
| 2-15: Unassigned | |||
| 9 | LSPA | 0: Reserved | RFC 5440; RFC Errata 4956 |
| 1: LSP Attributes | RFC 5440 | ||
| 2-15: Unassigned | |||
| 10 | IRO | 0: Reserved | RFC 5440; RFC Errata 4956 |
| 1: Include Route | RFC 5440 | ||
| 2-15: Unassigned | |||
| 11 | SVEC | 0: Reserved | RFC 5440; RFC Errata 4956 |
| 1: Synchronization Vector | RFC 5440 | ||
| 2-15: Unassigned | |||
| 12 | NOTIFICATION | 0: Reserved | RFC 5440; RFC Errata 4956 |
| 1: Notification | RFC 5440 | ||
| 2-15: Unassigned | |||
| 13 | PCEP-ERROR | 0: Reserved | RFC 5440; RFC Errata 4956 |
| 1: PCEP Error | RFC 5440 | ||
| 2-15: Unassigned | |||
| 14 | LOAD-BALANCING | 0: Reserved | RFC 5440; RFC Errata 4956 |
| 1: Load Balancing | RFC 5440 | ||
| 2: Generalized Load Balancing | RFC 8779, Section 2.4 | ||
| 3-15: Unassigned | |||
| 15 | CLOSE | 0: Reserved | RFC 5440; RFC Errata 4956 |
| 1: Close | RFC 5440 | ||
| 2-15: Unassigned | |||
| 16 | PATH-KEY | 0: Reserved | RFC 5520; RFC Errata 4956 |
| 1: Path Key | RFC 5520 | ||
| 2-15: Unassigned | |||
| 17 | XRO | 0: Reserved | RFC 5521; RFC Errata 4956 |
| 1: Route exclusion | RFC 5521 | ||
| 2-15: Unassigned | |||
| 18 | Unassigned | 0: Reserved | RFC Errata 4956 |
| 1-15: Unassigned | |||
| 19 | MONITORING | 0: Reserved | RFC 5886; RFC Errata 4956 |
| 1: Monitoring | RFC 5886 | ||
| 2-15: Unassigned | |||
| 20 | PCC-REQ-ID | 0: Reserved | RFC 5886; RFC Errata 4956 |
| 1: IPV4 Addresses | RFC 5886 | ||
| 2: IPV6 Addresses | RFC 5886 | ||
| 3-15: Unassigned | |||
| 21 | OF | 0: Reserved | RFC 5541; RFC Errata 4956 |
| 1: Objective Function | RFC 5541 | ||
| 2-15: Unassigned | |||
| 22 | CLASSTYPE | 0: Reserved | RFC 5455; RFC Errata 4956 |
| 1: Class-Type | RFC 5455 | ||
| 2-15: Unassigned | |||
| 23 | Unassigned | 0: Reserved | RFC Errata 4956 |
| 1-15: Unassigned | |||
| 24 | GLOBAL-CONSTRAINTS | 0: Reserved | RFC 5557; RFC Errata 4956 |
| 1: Global Constraints | RFC 5557 | ||
| 2-15: Unassigned | |||
| 25 | PCE-ID | 0: Reserved | RFC 5886; RFC Errata 4956 |
| 1: IPV4 Addresses | RFC 5886 | ||
| 2: IPV6 Addresses | RFC 5886 | ||
| 3-15: Unassigned | |||
| 26 | PROC-TIME | 0: Reserved | RFC 5886; RFC Errata 4956 |
| 1: PROC-TIME | RFC 5886 | ||
| 2-15: Unassigned | |||
| 27 | OVERLOAD | 0: Reserved | RFC 5886; RFC Errata 4956 |
| 1: overload | RFC 5886 | ||
| 2-15: Unassigned | |||
| 28 | UNREACH-DESTINATION | 0: Reserved | RFC 8306 |
| 1: IPv4 | RFC 8306 | ||
| 2: IPv6 | RFC 8306 | ||
| 3-15: Unassigned | |||
| 29 | SERO | 0: Reserved | RFC 8306 |
| 1: SERO | RFC 8306 | ||
| 2-15: Unassigned | |||
| 30 | SRRO | 0: Reserved | RFC 8306 |
| 1: SRRO | RFC 8306 | ||
| 2-15: Unassigned | |||
| 31 | BNC | 0: Reserved | RFC 8306 |
| 1: Branch node list | RFC 8306 | ||
| 2: Non-branch node list | RFC 8306 | ||
| 3-15: Unassigned | |||
| 32 | LSP | 0: Reserved | RFC 8231 |
| 1: LSP | RFC 8231 | ||
| 2-15: Unassigned | |||
| 33 | SRP | 0: Reserved | RFC 8231 |
| 1: SRP | RFC 8231 | ||
| 2-15: Unassigned | |||
| 34 | VENDOR-INFORMATION | 0: Reserved | RFC 7470; RFC Errata 4956 |
| 1: Vendor-Specific Constraints | RFC 7470 | ||
| 2-15: Unassigned | |||
| 35 | BU | 0: Reserved | RFC 8233; RFC Errata 4956 |
| 1: BU | RFC 8233 | ||
| 2-15: Unassigned | |||
| 36 | INTER-LAYER | 0: Reserved | RFC 8282 |
| 1: Inter-layer | RFC 8282 | ||
| 2-15: Unassigned | |||
| 37 | SWITCH-LAYER | 0: Reserved | RFC 8282 |
| 1: Switch-layer | RFC 8282 | ||
| 2-15: Unassigned | |||
| 38 | REQ-ADAP-CAP | 0: Reserved | RFC 8282 |
| 1: Req-Adap-Cap | RFC 8282 | ||
| 2-15: Unassigned | |||
| 39 | SERVER-INDICATION | 0: Reserved | RFC 8282 |
| 1: Server-indication | RFC 8282 | ||
| 2-15: Unassigned | |||
| 40 | ASSOCIATION | 0: Reserved | RFC 8697 |
| 1: IPv4 | RFC 8697 | ||
| 2: IPv6 | RFC 8697 | ||
| 3-15: Unassigned | |||
| 41 | S2LS | 0: Reserved | RFC 8623 |
| 1: S2LS | RFC 8623 | ||
| 2-15: Unassigned | |||
| 42 | WA | 0: Reserved | RFC 8780 |
| 1: Wavelength Assignment | RFC 8780 | ||
| 2-15: Unassigned | |||
| 43 | FLOWSPEC | 0: Reserved | RFC 9168 |
| 1: Flow Specification | RFC 9168 | ||
| 2-15: Unassigned | |||
| 44 | CCI Object-Type | 0: Reserved | RFC 9050 |
| 1: MPLS Label | RFC 9050 | ||
| 2: Native IP | RFC 9757 | ||
| 3: SR P2MP Policy (TEMPORARY - registered 2024-08-27, extension registered 2026-08-06, expires 2027-08-27) | draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-11 | ||
| 4-15: Unassigned | |||
| 45 | PATH-ATTRIB | 0: Reserved | RFC-ietf-pce-multipath-29 |
| 1: PATH-ATTRIB | RFC-ietf-pce-multipath-29 | ||
| 2-15: Unassigned | |||
| 46 | BGP Peer Info Object-Type | 0: Reserved | RFC 9757 |
| 1: IPv4 address | RFC 9757 | ||
| 2: IPv6 address | RFC 9757 | ||
| 3-15: Unassigned | |||
| 47 | Explicit Peer Route Object-Type | 0: Reserved | RFC 9757 |
| 1: IPv4 address | RFC 9757 | ||
| 2: IPv6 address | RFC 9757 | ||
| 3-15: Unassigned | |||
| 48 | Peer Prefix Advertisement Object-Type | 0: Reserved | RFC 9757 |
| 1: IPv4 address | RFC 9757 | ||
| 2: IPv6 address | RFC 9757 | ||
| 3-15: Unassigned | |||
| 49-247 | Unassigned | 0: Reserved | RFC Errata 4956 |
| 1-15: Unassigned | |||
| 248-255 | Experimental Use | 0-15: Experimental Use | RFC 8356 |
PCEP Message Common Header Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 5440: Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)
Note
Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.
Available Formats
| Bit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | Unassigned |
Open Object Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 5440: Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)
Note
Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.
Available Formats
| Bit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0-4 | Unassigned |
RP Object Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 5440: Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)
Note
Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.
Available Formats
| Bit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0-14 | Unassigned | |
| 15-16 | Routing Granularity (RG) | RFC 8779, Section 2.2 |
| 17 | Core-tree computation (C-bit) | RFC 7334 |
| 18 | Fragmentation (F-bit) | RFC 8306 |
| 19 | P2MP (N-bit) | RFC 8306 |
| 20 | ERO-compression (E-bit) | RFC 8306 |
| 21 | Make-before-break (M-bit) | RFC 5557 |
| 22 | Report the request order (D-bit) | RFC 5557 |
| 23 | Path Key (P-bit) | RFC 5520 |
| 24 | Supply OF on response | RFC 5541 |
| 25 | VSPT | RFC 5441 |
| 26 | Strict/Loose | RFC 5440 |
| 27 | Bi-directional | RFC 5440 |
| 28 | Reoptimization | RFC 5440 |
| 29-31 | Priority | RFC 5440 |
NO-PATH Object NI Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 5440: Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)
Available Formats
NO-PATH Object Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 5440: Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)
Note
Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.
Available Formats
| Bit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Unsatisfied constrained indicated | RFC 5440 |
| 1-15 | Unassigned |
METRIC Object T Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 5440: Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)
Available Formats
| Value | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Reserved | RFC 5440 |
| 1 | IGP metric | RFC 5440 |
| 2 | TE metric | RFC 5440 |
| 3 | Hop Counts | RFC 5440 |
| 4 | Aggregate bandwidth consumption | RFC 5541 |
| 5 | Load of the most loaded link | RFC 5541 |
| 6 | Cumulative IGP cost | RFC 5541 |
| 7 | Cumulative TE cost | RFC 5541 |
| 8 | P2MP IGP metric | RFC 8306 |
| 9 | P2MP TE metric | RFC 8306 |
| 10 | P2MP hop count metric | RFC 8306 |
| 11 | Segment-ID (SID) Depth. | RFC 8664 |
| 12 | Path Delay metric | RFC 8233 |
| 13 | Path Delay Variation metric | RFC 8233 |
| 14 | Path Loss metric | RFC 8233 |
| 15 | P2MP Path Delay metric | RFC 8233 |
| 16 | P2MP Path Delay variation metric | RFC 8233 |
| 17 | P2MP Path Loss metric | RFC 8233 |
| 18 | Number of adaptations on a path | RFC 8282 |
| 19 | Number of layers on a path | RFC 8282 |
| 20 | Domain Count metric | RFC 8685 |
| 21 | Border Node Count metric | RFC 8685 |
| 22 | Path Min Delay metric | RFC 9933 |
| 23 | P2MP Path Min Delay metric | RFC 9933 |
| 24 | Path Bandwidth metric | RFC 9933 |
| 25 | P2MP Path Bandwidth metric | RFC 9933 |
| 26-127 | Unassigned | |
| 128-255 | User-defined metric | RFC 9933 |
METRIC Object Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 5440: Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)
Note
Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.
Available Formats
LSPA Object Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 5440: Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)
Note
Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.
Available Formats
IRO Subobjects
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 5521: Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for Route Exclusions
Available Formats
| Value | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | IPv4 prefix | RFC 3209 |
| 2 | IPv6 prefix | RFC 3209 |
| 3 | Unassigned | |
| 4 | Unnumbered Interface ID | RFC 3477 |
| 5 | 4-byte AS number | RFC 7897; RFC 7898 |
| 6 | OSPF Area ID | RFC 7897; RFC 7898 |
| 7 | IS-IS Area ID | RFC 7897; RFC 7898 |
| 8 | Optical Interface Class List | RFC 8780 |
| 9 | Client Signal Information | RFC 8780 |
| 10 | Label | RFC 8779 |
| 11-31 | Unassigned | |
| 32 | Autonomous system number | RFC 3209 |
| 33 | Explicit Exclusion Route subobject (EXRS) | RFC 4874 |
| 34-127 | Unassigned |
SVEC Object Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 5440: Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)
Note
Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.
Available Formats
Notification Object
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 5440: Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)
Available Formats
| Notification-type | Name | Notification-value | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Reserved | 1-255: Reserved | RFC 5440 |
| 1 | Pending Request cancelled | 1: PCC cancels a set of pending requests | RFC 5440 |
| 2: PCE cancels a set of pending requests | RFC 5440 | ||
| 3-255: Unassigned | |||
| 2 | PCE Congestion | 1: PCE in congested state | RFC 5440 |
| 2: PCE no longer in congested state | RFC 5440 | ||
| 3-255: Unassigned | |||
| 3 | Unassigned | 1-255: Unassigned | |
| 4 | Stateful PCE resource limit exceeded | 0: Unassigned | |
| 1: Entering resource limit exceeded state | RFC 8231 | ||
| 2: Deprecated | RFC 8231 | ||
| 3-255: Unassigned | |||
| 5 | Auto-Bandwidth Overwhelm State | 0: Unassigned | |
| 1: Entering Auto-Bandwidth Overwhelm State | RFC 8733 | ||
| 2: Clearing Auto-Bandwidth Overwhelm State | RFC 8733 | ||
| 3-255: Unassigned | |||
| 6-255 | Unassigned | 1-255: Unassigned |
Notification Object Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 5440: Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)
Note
Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.
Available Formats
| Bit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0-7 | Unassigned |
PCEP-ERROR Object Error Types and Values
Reference
- RFC 5440: Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)
- RFC 9756: Update to the IANA Path Communication Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers Registration Procedures and the Allowance of Experimental Error Codes
Available Formats
| Range | Registration Procedures | Note |
|---|---|---|
| 0-251 | IETF Review | The IETF Review procedure applies to all Error-values (0-255) for Error-Types in this range. |
| 252-255 | Experimental Use | The Experimental Use policy applies to all Error-values (0-255) for Error-Types in this range. |
| Error-Type | Meaning | Error-value | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Reserved | 0-255: Reserved | RFC 5440 |
| 1 | PCEP session establishment failure | 0: Unassigned | RFC 5440 |
| 1: reception of an invalid Open message or a non Open message. | RFC 5440 | ||
| 2: no Open message received before the expiration of the OpenWait timer | RFC 5440 | ||
| 3: unacceptable and non negotiable session characteristics | RFC 5440 | ||
| 4: unacceptable but negotiable session characteristics | RFC 5440 | ||
| 5: reception of a second Open message with still unacceptable session characteristics | RFC 5440 | ||
| 6: reception of a PCErr message proposing unacceptable session characteristics | RFC 5440 | ||
| 7: No Keepalive or PCErr message received before the expiration of the KeepWait timer | RFC 5440 | ||
| 8: PCEP version not supported | RFC 5440 | ||
| 9-255: Unassigned | |||
| 2 | Capability not supported | 0-255: Unassigned | RFC 5440 |
| 3 | Unknown Object | 0: Unassigned | RFC 5440 |
| 1: Unrecognized object class | RFC 5440 | ||
| 2: Unrecognized object Type | RFC 5440 | ||
| 3-255: Unassigned | |||
| 4 | Not supported object | 0: Unassigned | RFC 5440 |
| 1: Not supported object class | RFC 5440 | ||
| 2: Not supported object Type | RFC 5440 | ||
| 3: Unassigned | |||
| 4: Unsupported parameter | RFC 5441 | ||
| 5: Unsupported network performance constraint | RFC 8233 | ||
| 6: BANDWIDTH object type 3 or 4 not supported | RFC 8779 | ||
| 7: Unsupported endpoint type in END-POINTS Generalized Endpoint object type | RFC 8779 | ||
| 8: Unsupported TLV present in END-POINTS Generalized Endpoint object type | RFC 8779 | ||
| 9: Unsupported granularity in the RP object flags | RFC 8779 | ||
| 10-255: Unassigned | |||
| 5 | Policy violation | 0: Unassigned | RFC 5440 |
| 1: C bit of the METRIC object set (request rejected) | RFC 5440 | ||
| 2: O bit of the RP object cleared (request rejected) | RFC 5440 | ||
| 3: objective function not allowed (request rejected) | RFC 5541 | ||
| 4: OF bit of the RP object set (request rejected) | RFC 5541 | ||
| 5: Global concurrent optimization not allowed | RFC 5557 | ||
| 6: Monitoring message supported but rejected due to policy violation | RFC 5886 | ||
| 7: P2MP Path computation is not allowed | RFC 8306 | ||
| 8: Not allowed network performance constraint | RFC 8233 | ||
| 9-255: Unassigned | |||
| 6 | Mandatory Object missing | 0: Unassigned | RFC 5440 |
| 1: RP object missing | RFC 5440 | ||
| 2: RRO missing for a reoptimization request (R bit of the RP object set) | RFC 5440 | ||
| 3: END-POINTS object missing | RFC 5440 | ||
| 4: MONITORING object missing | RFC 5886 | ||
| 5-7: Unassigned | |||
| 8: LSP object missing | RFC 8231 | ||
| 9: ERO object missing | RFC 8231 | ||
| 10: SRP object missing | RFC 8231 | ||
| 11: LSP-IDENTIFIERS TLV missing | RFC 8231 | ||
| 12: LSP-DB-VERSION TLV missing | RFC 8232 | ||
| 13: S2LS object missing | RFC 8623 | ||
| 14: P2MP-LSP-IDENTIFIERS TLV missing | RFC 8623 | ||
| 15: DISJOINTNESS-CONFIGURATION TLV missing | RFC 8800 | ||
| 16: Scheduled TLV missing | RFC 8934 | ||
| 17: CCI object missing | RFC 9050 | ||
| 18: VIRTUAL-NETWORK-TLV missing | RFC 9358 | ||
| 19: Native IP object missing | RFC 9757 | ||
| 20: LABEL-REQUEST TLV missing | RFC 9504 | ||
| 21: Missing SR Policy Mandatory TLV | RFC 9862 | ||
| 22: Missing SR Policy Association | RFC 9862 | ||
| 23-255: Unassigned | |||
| 7 | Synchronized path computation request missing | 0-255: Unassigned | RFC 5440 |
| 8 | Unknown request reference | 0-255: Unassigned | RFC 5440 |
| 9 | Attempt to establish a second PCEP session | 0-255: Unassigned | RFC 5440 |
| 10 | Reception of an invalid object | 0: Unassigned | RFC 5440 |
| 1: Reception of an object with P flag not set although the P-flag must be set according to this specification. | RFC 5440 | ||
| 2: Bad label value | RFC 8664 | ||
| 3: Unsupported number of SR-ERO subobjects | RFC 8664 | ||
| 4: Bad label format | RFC 8664 | ||
| 5: ERO mixes SR-ERO subobjects with other subobject types | RFC 8664 | ||
| 6: Both SID and NAI are absent in the SR-ERO subobject | RFC 8664 | ||
| 7: Both SID and NAI are absent in the SR-RRO subobject | RFC 8664 | ||
| 8: SYMBOLIC-PATH-NAME TLV missing | RFC 8281 | ||
| 9: MSD exceeds the default for the PCEP session | RFC 8664 | ||
| 10: RRO mixes SR-RRO subobjects with other subobject types | RFC 8664 | ||
| 11: Malformed object | RFC 8408 | ||
| 12: Missing PCE-SR-CAPABILITY sub-TLV | RFC 8664 | ||
| 13: Unsupported NAI Type in the SR-ERO/SR-RRO subobject | RFC 8664 | ||
| 14: Unknown SID | RFC 8664 | ||
| 15: NAI cannot be resolved to a SID | RFC 8664 | ||
| 16: Could not find SRGB | RFC 8664 | ||
| 17: SID index exceeds SRGB size | RFC 8664 | ||
| 18: Could not find SRLB | RFC 8664 | ||
| 19: SID index exceeds SRLB size | RFC 8664 | ||
| 20: Inconsistent SIDs in SR-ERO / SR-RRO subobjects | RFC 8664 | ||
| 21: MSD must be nonzero | RFC 8664 | ||
| 22: Mismatch of O field in S2LS and LSP object | RFC 8623 | ||
| 23: Incompatible OF codes in H-PCE | RFC 8685 | ||
| 24: Bad BANDWIDTH object type 3 or 4 | RFC 8779 | ||
| 25: Unsupported LSP Protection Flags in PROTECTION-ATTRIBUTE TLV | RFC 8779 | ||
| 26: Unsupported Secondary LSP Protection Flags in PROTECTION-ATTRIBUTE TLV | RFC 8779 | ||
| 27: Unsupported Link Protection Type in PROTECTION-ATTRIBUTE TLV | RFC 8779 | ||
| 28: LABEL-SET TLV present with O bit set but without R bit set in RP | RFC 8779 | ||
| 29: Wrong LABEL-SET TLV present with O and L bits set | RFC 8779 | ||
| 30: Wrong LABEL-SET TLV present with O bit set and wrong format | RFC 8779 | ||
| 31: Missing GMPLS-CAPABILITY TLV | RFC 8779 | ||
| 32: Incompatible OF code | RFC 8800 | ||
| 33: Missing PCECC Capability sub-TLV | RFC 9050 | ||
| 34: Missing PCE-SRv6-CAPABILITY sub-TLV | RFC 9603 | ||
| 35: Both SID and NAI are absent in SRv6-RRO subobject | RFC 9603 | ||
| 36: RRO mixes SRv6-RRO subobjects with other subobject types | RFC 9603 | ||
| 37: Invalid SRv6 SID Structure | RFC 9603 | ||
| 38: Conflicting Path ID | RFC-ietf-pce-multipath-29 | ||
| 39: PCECC NATIVE-IP-TE-CAPABILITY bit is not set | RFC 9757 | ||
| 40: Unsupported number of SRv6-ERO subobjects | RFC 9603 | ||
| 41: Unsupported NAI Type in the SRv6-ERO/SRv6-RRO subobject | RFC 9603 | ||
| 42: Both SID and NAI are absent in the SRv6-ERO subobject | RFC 9603 | ||
| 43: ERO mixes SRv6-ERO subobjects with other subobject types | RFC 9603 | ||
| 44: Missing SRPOLICY-CAPABILITY TLV | RFC 9862 | ||
| 45: Unexpected PATH-ATTRIB Object | RFC-ietf-pce-multipath-29 | ||
| 46-255: Unassigned | |||
| 11 | Unrecognized EXRS subobject | 0-255: Unassigned | RFC 5521 |
| 12 | Diffserv-aware TE error | 0: Unassigned | RFC 5455 |
| 1: Unsupported class-type | RFC 5455 | ||
| 2: Invalid class-type | RFC 5455 | ||
| 3: Class-Type and setup priority do not form a configured TE-class | RFC 5455 | ||
| 4-255: Unassigned | |||
| 13 | BRPC procedure completion failure | 0: Unassigned | RFC 5441 |
| 1: BRPC procedure not supported by one or more PCEs along the domain path | RFC 5441 | ||
| 2-255: Unassigned | |||
| 14 | Unassigned | 0-255: Unassigned | |
| 15 | Global Concurrent Optimization Error | 0: Unassigned | RFC 5557 |
| 1: Insufficient memory | RFC 5557 | ||
| 2: Global concurrent optimization not supported | RFC 5557 | ||
| 3-255: Unassigned | |||
| 16 | P2MP Capability Error | 0: Unassigned | RFC 8306 |
| 1: The PCE cannot satisfy the request due to insufficient memory | RFC 8306 | ||
| 2: The PCE is not capable of P2MP computation | RFC 8306 | ||
| 3-255: Unassigned | |||
| 17 | P2MP END-POINTS Error | 0: Unassigned | RFC 8306 |
| 1: The PCE cannot satisfy the request due to no END-POINTS with leaf type 2 | RFC 8306 | ||
| 2: The PCE cannot satisfy the request due to no END-POINTS with leaf type 3 | RFC 8306 | ||
| 3: The PCE cannot satisfy the request due to no END-POINTS with leaf type 4 | RFC 8306 | ||
| 4: The PCE cannot satisfy the request due to inconsistent END-POINTS | RFC 8306 | ||
| 5-255: Unassigned | |||
| 18 | P2MP Fragmentation Error | 0: Unassigned | RFC 8306 |
| 1: Fragmented request failure | RFC 8306 | ||
| 2: Fragmented Report failure | RFC 8623 | ||
| 3: Fragmented Update failure | RFC 8623 | ||
| 4: Fragmented Instantiation failure | RFC 8623 | ||
| 5-255: Unassigned | |||
| 19 | Invalid Operation | 0: Unassigned | RFC 8231 |
| 1: Attempted LSP Update Request for a non-delegated LSP. The PCEP-ERROR object is followed by the LSP object that identifies the LSP. | RFC 8231 | ||
| 2: Attempted LSP Update Request if the stateful PCE capability was not advertised. | RFC 8231 | ||
| 3: Attempted LSP Update Request for an LSP identified by an unknown PLSP-ID. | RFC 8231 | ||
| 4: Unassigned | |||
| 5: Attempted LSP State Report if active stateful PCE capability was not advertised. | RFC 8231 | ||
| 6: PCE-initiated LSP limit reached | RFC 8281 | ||
| 7: Delegation for PCE-initiated LSP cannot be revoked | RFC 8281 | ||
| 8: Non-zero PLSP-ID in LSP Initiate Request | RFC 8281 | ||
| 9: LSP is not PCE initiated | RFC 8281 | ||
| 10: PCE-initiated operation-frequency limit reached | RFC 8281 | ||
| 11: Attempted LSP State Report for P2MP if stateful PCE capability for P2MP was not advertised | RFC 8623 | ||
| 12: Attempted LSP Update Request for P2MP if active stateful PCE capability for P2MP was not advertised | RFC 8623 | ||
| 13: Attempted LSP Instantiation Request for P2MP if stateful PCE instantiation capability for P2MP was not advertised | RFC 8623 | ||
| 14: Auto-Bandwidth capability was not advertised | RFC 8733 | ||
| 15: Attempted LSP scheduling while the scheduling capability was not advertised | RFC 8934 | ||
| 16: Attempted PCECC operations when PCECC capability was not advertised | RFC 9050 | ||
| 17: Stateful PCE capability was not advertised | RFC 9050 | ||
| 18: Unknown Label | RFC 9050 | ||
| 19: Attempted SRv6 when the capability was not advertised | RFC 9603 | ||
| 20: Not supported path backup (TEMPORARY - registered 2022-05-09, extension registered 2026-04-03, expires 2027-05-09) | draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-17 | ||
| 21: Non-empty path | RFC-ietf-pce-multipath-29 | ||
| 22: Only one BPI, EPR, or PPA object can be included in this message | RFC 9757 | ||
| 23: LSP state info unavailable for reoptimization | RFC 9504 | ||
| 24: LSP state info for route exclusion not found | RFC 9504 | ||
| 25: Attempted LSP update request for GMPLS if stateful PCE capability not advertised | RFC 9504 | ||
| 26: Attempted LSP State Report for GMPLS if stateful PCE capability not advertised | RFC 9504 | ||
| 27: Attempted LSP instantiation request for GMPLS if stateful PCE instantiation capability not advertised | RFC 9504 | ||
| 28: Use of the Generalized Endpoint object type for non-GMPLS LSPs | RFC 9504 | ||
| 29: Attempted Native IP operations when the capability was not advertised | RFC 9757 | ||
| 30: Unknown Native IP Info | RFC 9757 | ||
| 31: Invalid Color | RFC 9863 | ||
| 32: Inconsistent Color | RFC 9863 | ||
| 33: Attempted use of SR-Algorithm without advertised capability | RFC 9933 | ||
| 34: Unsupported combination of constraints | RFC 9933 | ||
| 35: Path modification is blocked by constraint | RFC-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-16 | ||
| 36: Unsupported multipath capability | RFC-ietf-pce-multipath-29 | ||
| 37: Invalid opposite-direction path mapping | RFC-ietf-pce-multipath-29 | ||
| 38: LOAD-BALANCING and MULTIPATH-CAP TLV in the same request | RFC-ietf-pce-multipath-29 | ||
| 39-255: Unassigned | |||
| 20 | LSP State Synchronization Error | 0: Unassigned | RFC 8231 |
| 1: A PCE indicates to a PCC that it cannot process (an otherwise valid) LSP State Report. The PCEP- ERROR object is followed by the LSP object that identifies the LSP. | RFC 8231 | ||
| 2: LSP-DB version mismatch. | RFC 8232 | ||
| 3: Attempt to trigger synchronization before PCE trigger. | RFC 8232 | ||
| 4: Attempt to trigger a synchronization when the PCE triggered synchronization capability has not been advertised. | RFC 8232 | ||
| 5: A PCC indicates to a PCE that it cannot complete the State Synchronization. | RFC 8231 | ||
| 6: Received an invalid LSP-DB Version Number. | RFC 8232 | ||
| 7: Received an invalid Speaker Entity Identifier. | RFC 8232 | ||
| 8-255: Unassigned | |||
| 21 | Invalid traffic engineering path setup type | 0: Unassigned | RFC 8408 |
| 1: Unsupported path setup type | RFC 8408 | ||
| 2: Mismatched path setup type | RFC 8408 | ||
| 3-255: Unassigned | |||
| 22 | Unassigned | 0-255: Unassigned | |
| 23 | Bad parameter value | 0: Unassigned | RFC 8281 |
| 1: SYMBOLIC-PATH-NAME in use | RFC 8281 | ||
| 2: Speaker identity included for an LSP that is not PCE initiated | RFC 8281 | ||
| 3-255: Unassigned | |||
| 24 | LSP instantiation error | 0: Unassigned | RFC 8281 |
| 1: Unacceptable instantiation parameters | RFC 8281 | ||
| 2: Internal error | RFC 8281 | ||
| 3: Signaling error | RFC 8281 | ||
| 4-255: Unassigned | |||
| 25 | PCEP StartTLS failure | 0: Unassigned | RFC 8253 |
| 1: Reception of StartTLS after any PCEP exchange | RFC 8253 | ||
| 2: Reception of any other message apart from StartTLS, Open, or PCErr | RFC 8253 | ||
| 3: Failure, connection without TLS is not possible | RFC 8253 | ||
| 4: Failure, connection without TLS is possible | RFC 8253 | ||
| 5: No StartTLS message (nor PCErr/Open) before StartTLSWait timer expiry | RFC 8253 | ||
| 6-255: Unassigned | |||
| 26 | Association Error | 0: Unassigned | RFC 8697 |
| 1: Association Type is not supported | RFC 8697 | ||
| 2: Too many LSPs in the association group | RFC 8697 | ||
| 3: Too many association groups | RFC 8697 | ||
| 4: Association unknown | RFC 8697 | ||
| 5: Operator-configured association information mismatch | RFC 8697 | ||
| 6: Association information mismatch | RFC 8697 | ||
| 7: Cannot join the association group | RFC 8697 | ||
| 8: Association ID not in range | RFC 8697 | ||
| 9: Tunnel ID or End points mismatch for Path Protection Association | RFC 8745 | ||
| 10: Attempt to add another working/protection LSP for Path Protection Association | RFC 8745 | ||
| 11: Protection type is not supported | RFC 8745 | ||
| 12: Not expecting policy parameters | RFC 9005 | ||
| 13: Unacceptable policy parameters | RFC 9005 | ||
| 14: Association group mismatch | RFC 9059 | ||
| 15: Tunnel mismatch in the association group | RFC 9059 | ||
| 16: Path Setup Type not supported | RFC 9059 | ||
| 17: Bidirectional LSP direction mismatch | RFC 9059 | ||
| 18: Bidirectional LSP co-routed mismatch | RFC 9059 | ||
| 19: Endpoint mismatch in the association group | RFC 9059 | ||
| 20: SR Policy Identifiers Mismatch | RFC 9862 | ||
| 21: SR Policy Candidate Path Identifier Mismatch | RFC 9862 | ||
| 22-255: Unassigned | |||
| 27 | WSON RWA error | 0: Unassigned | RFC 8780 |
| 1: Insufficient memory | RFC 8780 | ||
| 2: RWA computation not supported | RFC 8780 | ||
| 3: Syntactical encoding error | RFC 8780 | ||
| 4-255: Unassigned | |||
| 28 | H-PCE Error | 0: Unassigned | RFC 8685 |
| 1: H-PCE Capability not advertised | RFC 8685 | ||
| 2: Parent PCE Capability cannot be provided | RFC 8685 | ||
| 3-255: Unassigned | |||
| 29 | Path computation failure | 0: Unassigned | RFC 8779 |
| 1: Unacceptable request message | RFC 8779 | ||
| 2: Generalized bandwidth value not supported | RFC 8779 | ||
| 3: Label set constraint could not be met | RFC 8779 | ||
| 4: Label constraint could not be met | RFC 8779 | ||
| 5: Constraints could not be met for some intervals | RFC 8934 | ||
| 6-255: Unassigned | |||
| 30 | FlowSpec error | 0: Unassigned | RFC 9168 |
| 1: Unsupported FlowSpec | RFC 9168 | ||
| 2: Malformed FlowSpec | RFC 9168 | ||
| 3: Unresolvable Conflict | RFC 9168 | ||
| 4: Unknown FlowSpec | RFC 9168 | ||
| 5: Unsupported LPM Route | RFC 9168 | ||
| 6-255: Unassigned | |||
| 31 | PCECC failure | 0: Unassigned | RFC 9050 |
| 1: Label out of range | RFC 9050 | ||
| 2: Instruction failed | RFC 9050 | ||
| 3: Invalid CCI | RFC 9050 | ||
| 4: Unable to allocate the specified CCI | RFC 9050 | ||
| 5: Invalid next-hop information | RFC 9050 | ||
| 6-255: Unassigned | |||
| 32 | Binding label/SID failure | 0: Unassigned | RFC 9604 |
| 1: Invalid SID | RFC 9604 | ||
| 2: Unable to allocate the specified binding value | RFC 9604 | ||
| 3: Unable to allocate a new binding label/SID | RFC 9604 | ||
| 4: Unable to remove the binding value | RFC 9604 | ||
| 5: Inconsistent binding types | RFC 9604 | ||
| 6-255: Unassigned | |||
| 33 | Native IP TE failure | 0: Unassigned | RFC 9757 |
| 1: Local IP is in use | RFC 9757 | ||
| 2: Remote IP is in use | RFC 9757 | ||
| 3: Explicit Peer Route Error | RFC 9757 | ||
| 4: EPR/BPI Peer Info mismatch | RFC 9757 | ||
| 5: BPI/PPA Address Family mismatch | RFC 9757 | ||
| 6: PPA/BPI Peer Info mismatch | RFC 9757 | ||
| 7-255: Unassigned | |||
| 34-251 | Unassigned | 0-255: Unassigned | |
| 252-255 | Reserved for Experimental Use | 0-255: Reserved for Experimental Use | RFC 9756 |
PCEP-ERROR Object Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 5440: Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)
Note
Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.
Available Formats
| Bit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0-7 | Unassigned |
LOAD-BALANCING Object Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 5440: Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)
Note
Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.
Available Formats
| Bit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0-7 | Unassigned |
CLOSE Object Reason Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 5440: Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)
Available Formats
| Value | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Reserved | RFC 5440 |
| 1 | No explanation provided | RFC 5440 |
| 2 | DeadTimer expired | RFC 5440 |
| 3 | Reception of a malformed PCEP message | RFC 5440 |
| 4 | Reception of an unacceptable number of unknown requests/replies | RFC 5440 |
| 5 | Reception of an unacceptable number of unrecognized PCEP messages | RFC 5440 |
| 6-255 | Unassigned |
CLOSE Object Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 5440: Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)
Note
Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.
Available Formats
| Bit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0-7 | Unassigned |
PATH-KEY Subobjects
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 5520: Preserving Topology Confidentiality in Inter-Domain Path Computation Using a Path-Key-Based Mechanism
Available Formats
XRO Subobjects
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 5521: Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for Route Exclusions
Available Formats
| Value | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | IPv4 prefix | RFC 3209 |
| 2 | IPv6 prefix | RFC 3209 |
| 3 | Unassigned | |
| 4 | Unnumbered Interface ID | RFC 3477 |
| 5 | 4-byte AS number | RFC 7897; RFC 7898 |
| 6 | OSPF Area ID | RFC 7897; RFC 7898 |
| 7 | IS-IS Area ID | RFC 7897; RFC 7898 |
| 8 | Optical Interface Class List | RFC 8780 |
| 9 | Client Signal Information | RFC 8780 |
| 10 | Label | RFC 8779 |
| 11 | LSP | RFC 9504 |
| 12-31 | Unassigned | |
| 32 | Autonomous system number | RFC 3209 |
| 33 | Unassigned | |
| 34 | SRLG | RFC 4874 |
| 35-63 | Unassigned | |
| 64 | IPv4 Path Key | RFC 5520 |
| 65 | IPv6 Path Key | RFC 5520 |
| 66-127 | Unassigned |
XRO Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 5521: Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for Route Exclusions
Note
Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.
Available Formats
| Bit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0-14 | Unassigned | |
| 15 | Fail (F-bit) | RFC 5521 |
Objective Function
Reference
- RFC 5541: Encoding of Objective Functions in the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP)
Available Formats
| Range | Registration Procedures |
|---|---|
| 1-1023 | IETF Review |
| 1024-32767 | First Come First Served |
| 32768-65535 | Reserved for Private Use |
| Code Point | Name | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Reserved | RFC 5541 |
| 1 | MCP | RFC 5541 |
| 2 | MLP | RFC 5541 |
| 3 | MBP | RFC 5541 |
| 4 | MBC | RFC 5541 |
| 5 | MLL | RFC 5541 |
| 6 | MCC | RFC 5541 |
| 7 | SPT | RFC 8306 |
| 8 | MCT | RFC 8306 |
| 9 | Minimum Packet Loss Path (MPLP) | RFC 8233 |
| 10 | Maximum Under-Utilized Path (MUP) | RFC 8233 |
| 11 | Maximum Reserved Under-Utilized Path (MRUP) | RFC 8233 |
| 12 | Minimize the number of Transit Domains (MTD) | RFC 8685 |
| 13 | Minimize the number of Border Nodes (MBN) | RFC 8685 |
| 14 | Minimize the number of Common Transit Domains (MCTD) | RFC 8685 |
| 15 | Minimize the number of Shared Links (MSL) | RFC 8800 |
| 16 | Minimize the number of Shared SRLGs (MSS) | RFC 8800 |
| 17 | Minimize the number of Shared Nodes (MSN) | RFC 8800 |
| 18-32767 | Unassigned | |
| 32768-65535 | Reserved for Private Use | RFC 5541 |
PCEP TLV Type Indicators
Reference
- RFC 5440: Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)
Available Formats
| Range | Registration Procedures |
|---|---|
| 0-65503 | IETF Review |
| 65504-65535 | Experimental Use |
| Value | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Reserved | RFC 5440 |
| 1 | NO-PATH-VECTOR TLV | RFC 5440 |
| 2 | OVERLOADED-DURATION TLV | RFC 5440; RFC Errata 8344 |
| 3 | REQ-MISSING TLV | RFC 5440 |
| 4 | OF-List | RFC 5541 |
| 5 | Order TLV | RFC 5557 |
| 6 | P2MP capable | RFC 8306 |
| 7 | VENDOR-INFORMATION-TLV | RFC 7470 |
| 8 | Wavelength Selection | RFC 8780 |
| 9 | Wavelength Restriction | RFC 8780 |
| 10 | Wavelength Allocation | RFC 8780 |
| 11 | Optical Interface Class List | RFC 8780 |
| 12 | Client Signal Information | RFC 8780 |
| 13 | H-PCE-CAPABILITY | RFC 8685 |
| 14 | Domain-ID | RFC 8685 |
| 15 | H-PCE-FLAG | RFC 8685 |
| 16 | STATEFUL-PCE-CAPABILITY | RFC 8231 |
| 17 | SYMBOLIC-PATH-NAME | RFC 8231 |
| 18 | IPV4-LSP-IDENTIFIERS | RFC 8231 |
| 19 | IPV6-LSP-IDENTIFIERS | RFC 8231 |
| 20 | LSP-ERROR-CODE | RFC 8231 |
| 21 | RSVP-ERROR-SPEC | RFC 8231 |
| 22 | Unassigned | |
| 23 | LSP-DB-VERSION | RFC 8232 |
| 24 | SPEAKER-ENTITY-ID | RFC 8232 |
| 25 | Unassigned | |
| 26 | SR-PCE-CAPABILITY (deprecated) | RFC 8664 |
| 27 | Unassigned | |
| 28 | PATH-SETUP-TYPE | RFC 8408 |
| 29 | Operator-configured Association Range | RFC 8697 |
| 30 | Global Association Source | RFC 8697 |
| 31 | Extended Association ID | RFC 8697 |
| 32 | P2MP-IPV4-LSP-IDENTIFIERS | RFC 8623 |
| 33 | P2MP-IPV6-LSP-IDENTIFIERS | RFC 8623 |
| 34 | PATH-SETUP-TYPE-CAPABILITY | RFC 8408 |
| 35 | ASSOC-Type-List | RFC 8697 |
| 36 | AUTO-BANDWIDTH-CAPABILITY | RFC 8733 |
| 37 | AUTO-BANDWIDTH-ATTRIBUTES | RFC 8733 |
| 38 | Path Protection Association Group TLV | RFC 8745 |
| 39 | IPV4-ADDRESS | RFC 8779, Section 2.5.2.1 |
| 40 | IPV6-ADDRESS | RFC 8779, Section 2.5.2.2 |
| 41 | UNNUMBERED-ENDPOINT | RFC 8779, Section 2.5.2.3 |
| 42 | LABEL-REQUEST | RFC 8779, Section 2.5.2.4 |
| 43 | LABEL-SET | RFC 8779, Section 2.5.2.5 |
| 44 | PROTECTION-ATTRIBUTE | RFC 8779, Section 2.8 |
| 45 | GMPLS-CAPABILITY | RFC 8779, Section 2.1.2 |
| 46 | DISJOINTNESS-CONFIGURATION | RFC 8800 |
| 47 | DISJOINTNESS-STATUS | RFC 8800 |
| 48 | POLICY-PARAMETERS-TLV | RFC 9005 |
| 49 | SCHED-LSP-ATTRIBUTE | RFC 8934 |
| 50 | SCHED-PD-LSP-ATTRIBUTE | RFC 8934 |
| 51 | PCE-FLOWSPEC-CAPABILITY TLV | RFC 9168 |
| 52 | FLOW FILTER TLV | RFC 9168 |
| 53 | Unassigned | |
| 54 | Bidirectional LSP Association Group TLV | RFC 9059 |
| 55 | TE-PATH-BINDING | RFC 9604 |
| 56 | SRPOLICY-POL-NAME | RFC 9862 |
| 57 | SRPOLICY-CPATH-ID | RFC 9862 |
| 58 | SRPOLICY-CPATH-NAME | RFC 9862 |
| 59 | SRPOLICY-CPATH-PREFERENCE | RFC 9862 |
| 60 | MULTIPATH-CAP | RFC-ietf-pce-multipath-29 |
| 61 | MULTIPATH-WEIGHT | RFC-ietf-pce-multipath-29 |
| 62 | MULTIPATH-BACKUP (TEMPORARY - registered 2022-05-09, extension registered 2026-04-03, expires 2027-05-09) | draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-17 |
| 63 | MULTIPATH-OPPDIR-PATH | RFC-ietf-pce-multipath-29 |
| 64 | LSP-EXTENDED-FLAG | RFC 9357 |
| 65 | VIRTUAL-NETWORK-TLV | RFC 9358 |
| 66 | SR-Algorithm | RFC 9933 |
| 67 | Color | RFC 9863 |
| 68 | COMPUTATION-PRIORITY | RFC 9862 |
| 69 | EXPLICIT-NULL-LABEL-POLICY | RFC 9862 |
| 70 | INVALIDATION | RFC 9862 |
| 71 | SRPOLICY-CAPABILITY | RFC 9862 |
| 72 | PATH-MODIFICATION TLV | RFC-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-16 |
| 73 | SR-P2MP-POLICY-CAPABILITY (TEMPORARY - registered 2024-08-27, extension registered 2026-08-06, expires 2027-08-27) | draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-11 |
| 74 | IPV4-SR-P2MP-INSTANCE-ID TLV (TEMPORARY - registered 2024-08-27, extension registered 2026-08-06, expires 2027-08-27) | draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-11 |
| 75 | IPV6-SR-P2MP-INSTANCE-ID TLV (TEMPORARY - registered 2024-08-27, extension registered 2026-08-06, expires 2027-08-27) | draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-11 |
| 76 | MULTIPATH-FORWARD-CLASS | RFC-ietf-pce-multipath-29 |
| 77-65503 | Unassigned | |
| 65504-65535 | Experimental Use | RFC 8356 |
NO-PATH-VECTOR TLV Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 5440: Path Computation Element (PCE) Communication Protocol (PCEP)
Note
Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.
Available Formats
| Bit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0-9 | Unassigned | |
| 10 | Requested disjoint computation not supported | RFC 8800 |
| 11 | Disjoint path not found | RFC 8800 |
| 12 | LOAD-BALANCING could not be performed with the bandwidth constraints | RFC 8779 |
| 13 | No label resource in range | RFC 8779 |
| 14 | No endpoint label resource in range | RFC 8779 |
| 15 | No endpoint label resource | RFC 8779 |
| 16 | Granularity not supported | RFC 8779 |
| 17 | No Resource | RFC 8779 |
| 18 | Protection Mismatch | RFC 8779 |
| 19 | Destination is not found in the indicated domain | RFC 8685 |
| 20 | No available resource in one or more domains | RFC 8685 |
| 21 | Unresponsive child PCE(s) | RFC 8685 |
| 22 | Destination domain unknown | RFC 8685 |
| 23 | No RWA constraints met | RFC 8780 |
| 24 | P2MP Reachability Problem | RFC 8306 |
| 25 | No GCO solution found | RFC 5557 |
| 26 | No GCO migration path found | RFC 5557 |
| 27 | PKS expansion failure | RFC 5520 |
| 28 | BRPC Path computation chain unavailable | RFC 5441 |
| 29 | Unknown Source | RFC 5440 |
| 30 | Unknown Destination | RFC 5440 |
| 31 | PCE currently Unavailable | RFC 5440 |
MONITORING Object Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 5886: A Set of Monitoring Tools for Path Computation Element (PCE)-Based Architecture
Note
Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.
Available Formats
PROC-TIME Object Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 5886: A Set of Monitoring Tools for Path Computation Element (PCE)-Based Architecture
Note
Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.
Available Formats
| Bit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0-14 | Unassigned | |
| 15 | Estimated | RFC 5886 |
OVERLOAD Object Flag field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 5886: A Set of Monitoring Tools for Path Computation Element (PCE)-Based Architecture
Note
Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.
Available Formats
| Bit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0-7 | Unassigned |
BU Object Type Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 8233: Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) to Compute Service-Aware Label Switched Paths (LSPs)
- RFC 9756: Update to the IANA Path Communication Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers Registration Procedures and the Allowance of Experimental Error Codes
Available Formats
Inter-Layer Object Path Property Bits
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 8282: Extensions to the Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) for Inter-Layer MPLS and GMPLS Traffic Engineering
Available Formats
LSP Object Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 8231: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Stateful PCE
- RFC 9756: Update to the IANA Path Communication Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers Registration Procedures and the Allowance of Experimental Error Codes
Note
Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.
Available Formats
STATEFUL-PCE-CAPABILITY TLV Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 8231: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Stateful PCE
- RFC 9756: Update to the IANA Path Communication Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers Registration Procedures and the Allowance of Experimental Error Codes
Note
Bits are numbered from bit 0 as the most significant bit.
Available Formats
| Value | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0-16 | Unassigned | |
| 17 | RELAX | RFC 9753 |
| 18 | STRICT-PATH-CAPABILITY | RFC-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-16 |
| 19 | PATH-MODIFICATION-CAPABILITY | RFC-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-16 |
| 20 | COLOR-CAPABILITY | RFC 9863 |
| 21 | PD-LSP-CAPABILITY (PD-bit) | RFC 8934 |
| 22 | LSP-SCHEDULING-CAPABILITY (B-bit) | RFC 8934 |
| 23 | P2MP-LSP-INSTANTIATION-CAPABILITY | RFC 8623 |
| 24 | P2MP-LSP-UPDATE-CAPABILITY | RFC 8623 |
| 25 | P2MP-CAPABILITY | RFC 8623 |
| 26 | TRIGGERED-INITIAL-SYNC | RFC 8232 |
| 27 | DELTA-LSP-SYNC-CAPABILITY | RFC 8232 |
| 28 | TRIGGERED-RESYNC | RFC 8232 |
| 29 | LSP-INSTANTIATION-CAPABILITY (I) | RFC 8281 |
| 30 | INCLUDE-DB-VERSION | RFC 8232 |
| 31 | LSP-UPDATE-CAPABILITY | RFC 8231 |
LSP-ERROR-CODE TLV Error Code Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 8231: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Stateful PCE
- RFC 9756: Update to the IANA Path Communication Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers Registration Procedures and the Allowance of Experimental Error Codes
Available Formats
| Value | Meaning | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Reserved | RFC 8231 |
| 1 | Unknown reason | RFC 8231 |
| 2 | Limit reached for PCE-controlled LSPs | RFC 8231 |
| 3 | Too many pending LSP update requests | RFC 8231 |
| 4 | Unacceptable parameters | RFC 8231 |
| 5 | Internal error | RFC 8231 |
| 6 | LSP administratively brought down | RFC 8231 |
| 7 | LSP preempted | RFC 8231 |
| 8 | RSVP signaling error | RFC 8231 |
| 9 | Deprecated (Unsupported Color) | RFC 9863 |
| 10 | SID Verification fails | RFC 9603 |
| 11-65535 | Unassigned |
SRP Object Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 8281: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for PCE-Initiated LSP Setup in a Stateful PCE Model
- RFC 8786: Updated Rules for Processing Stateful PCE Request Parameters Flags
- RFC 9756: Update to the IANA Path Communication Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers Registration Procedures and the Allowance of Experimental Error Codes
Available Formats
PCEP Path Setup Types
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 8408: Conveying Path Setup Type in PCE Communication Protocol (PCEP) Messages
Available Formats
| Value | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Path is set up using the RSVP-TE signaling protocol | RFC 8408 |
| 1 | Traffic-engineering path is set up using Segment Routing. | RFC 8664 |
| 2 | Traffic engineering path is set up using PCECC mode | RFC 9050 |
| 3 | Traffic engineering path is set up using SRv6. | RFC 9603 |
| 4 | Native IP TE Path | RFC 9757 |
| 5-255 | Unassigned |
PCEP SR-ERO NAI Types
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 8664: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Segment Routing
Available Formats
| Value | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | NAI is absent. | RFC 8664 |
| 1 | NAI is an IPv4 node ID. | RFC 8664 |
| 2 | NAI is an IPv6 node ID. | RFC 8664 |
| 3 | NAI is an IPv4 adjacency. | RFC 8664 |
| 4 | NAI is an IPv6 adjacency with global IPv6 addresses. | RFC 8664 |
| 5 | NAI is an unnumbered adjacency with IPv4 node IDs. | RFC 8664 |
| 6 | NAI is an IPv6 adjacency with link-local IPv6 addresses. | RFC 8664 |
| 7-15 | Unassigned |
SR-ERO Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 8664: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Segment Routing
- RFC 9756: Update to the IANA Path Communication Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers Registration Procedures and the Allowance of Experimental Error Codes
Available Formats
PATH-SETUP-TYPE-CAPABILITY Sub-TLV Type Indicators
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 8664: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Segment Routing
- RFC 9756: Update to the IANA Path Communication Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers Registration Procedures and the Allowance of Experimental Error Codes
Available Formats
SR Capability Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 8664: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Segment Routing
- RFC 9756: Update to the IANA Path Communication Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers Registration Procedures and the Allowance of Experimental Error Codes
Available Formats
WA Object Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 8780: The Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extension for Wavelength Switched Optical Network (WSON) Routing and Wavelength Assignment (RWA)
- RFC 9756: Update to the IANA Path Communication Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers Registration Procedures and the Allowance of Experimental Error Codes
Available Formats
| Bit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0-14 | Unassigned | |
| 15 | Wavelength Allocation Mode | RFC 8780 |
Wavelength Restriction TLV Action Values
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 8780: The Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extension for Wavelength Switched Optical Network (WSON) Routing and Wavelength Assignment (RWA)
- RFC 9756: Update to the IANA Path Communication Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers Registration Procedures and the Allowance of Experimental Error Codes
Available Formats
Wavelength Allocation TLV Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 8780: The Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extension for Wavelength Switched Optical Network (WSON) Routing and Wavelength Assignment (RWA)
- RFC 9756: Update to the IANA Path Communication Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers Registration Procedures and the Allowance of Experimental Error Codes
Available Formats
| Bit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0-14 | Unassigned | |
| 15 | Wavelength Allocation Mode | RFC 8780 |
S2LS Object Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 8623: Stateful Path Computation Element (PCE) Protocol Extensions for Usage with Point-to-Multipoint TE Label Switched Paths (LSPs)
- RFC 9756: Update to the IANA Path Communication Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers Registration Procedures and the Allowance of Experimental Error Codes
Available Formats
| Bit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0-28 | Unassigned | |
| 29-31 | Operational (3 bits) | RFC 8623 |
H-PCE-CAPABILITY TLV Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 8685: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for the Hierarchical Path Computation Element (H-PCE) Architecture
- RFC 9756: Update to the IANA Path Communication Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers Registration Procedures and the Allowance of Experimental Error Codes
Available Formats
| Bit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0-30 | Unassigned | |
| 31 | P (Parent PCE Request bit) | RFC 8685 |
Domain-ID TLV Domain Type
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 8685: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for the Hierarchical Path Computation Element (H-PCE) Architecture
Available Formats
H-PCE-FLAG TLV Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 8685: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for the Hierarchical Path Computation Element (H-PCE) Architecture
- RFC 9756: Update to the IANA Path Communication Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers Registration Procedures and the Allowance of Experimental Error Codes
Available Formats
ASSOCIATION Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 8697: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Establishing Relationships between Sets of Label Switched Paths (LSPs)
- RFC 9756: Update to the IANA Path Communication Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers Registration Procedures and the Allowance of Experimental Error Codes
Available Formats
| Bit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0-14 | Unassigned | |
| 15 | R (Removal) | RFC 8697 |
ASSOCIATION Type Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 8697: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Establishing Relationships between Sets of Label Switched Paths (LSPs)
- RFC 9756: Update to the IANA Path Communication Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers Registration Procedures and the Allowance of Experimental Error Codes
Available Formats
| Type | Name | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Reserved | RFC 8697 |
| 1 | Path Protection Association | RFC 8745 |
| 2 | Disjoint Association | RFC 8800 |
| 3 | Policy Association | RFC 9005 |
| 4 | Single-Sided Bidirectional LSP Association | RFC 9059 |
| 5 | Double-Sided Bidirectional LSP Association | RFC 9059 |
| 6 | SR Policy Association | RFC 9862 |
| 7 | VN Association | RFC 9358 |
| 8 | Bidirectional SR LSP Association | RFC-ietf-pce-sr-bidir-path-25 |
| 9 | P2MP SR Policy Association (TEMPORARY - registered 2024-08-27, extension registered 2026-08-06, expires 2027-08-27) | draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-11 |
| 10-65535 | Unassigned |
AUTO-BANDWIDTH-CAPABILITY TLV Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 8733: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for MPLS-TE Label Switched Path (LSP) Auto-Bandwidth Adjustment with Stateful PCE
- RFC 9756: Update to the IANA Path Communication Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers Registration Procedures and the Allowance of Experimental Error Codes
Available Formats
| Bit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0-31 | Unassigned |
AUTO-BANDWIDTH-ATTRIBUTES Sub-TLV Types
Reference
- RFC 8733: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for MPLS-TE Label Switched Path (LSP) Auto-Bandwidth Adjustment with Stateful PCE
Available Formats
| Range | Registration Procedures |
|---|---|
| 0-65503 | IETF Review |
| 65504-65535 | Experimental Use |
| Type | Name | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Reserved | RFC 8733 |
| 1 | Sample-Interval | RFC 8733 |
| 2 | Adjustment-Interval | RFC 8733 |
| 3 | Down-Adjustment-Interval | RFC 8733 |
| 4 | Adjustment-Threshold | RFC 8733 |
| 5 | Adjustment-Threshold-Percentage | RFC 8733 |
| 6 | Down-Adjustment-Threshold | RFC 8733 |
| 7 | Down-Adjustment-Threshold-Percentage | RFC 8733 |
| 8 | Minimum-Bandwidth | RFC 8733 |
| 9 | Maximum-Bandwidth | RFC 8733 |
| 10 | Overflow-Threshold | RFC 8733 |
| 11 | Overflow-Threshold-Percentage | RFC 8733 |
| 12 | Underflow-Threshold | RFC 8733 |
| 13 | Underflow-Threshold-Percentage | RFC 8733 |
| 14-65503 | Unassigned | |
| 65504-65535 | Experimental Use | RFC 8733 |
Path Protection Association Group TLV Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 8745: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Associating Working and Protection Label Switched Paths (LSPs) with Stateful PCE
- RFC 9756: Update to the IANA Path Communication Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers Registration Procedures and the Allowance of Experimental Error Codes
Available Formats
Generalized Endpoint Types
Reference
- RFC 8779: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for GMPLS
- RFC 9756: Update to the IANA Path Communication Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers Registration Procedures and the Allowance of Experimental Error Codes
Available Formats
| Range | Registration Procedures |
|---|---|
| 0-244 | IETF Review |
| 245-255 | Experimental Use |
| Value | Type | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Point-to-Point | RFC 8779 |
| 1 | Point-to-Multipoint with leaf type 1 | RFC 8779 |
| 2 | Point-to-Multipoint with leaf type 2 | RFC 8779 |
| 3 | Point-to-Multipoint with leaf type 3 | RFC 8779 |
| 4 | Point-to-Multipoint with leaf type 4 | RFC 8779 |
| 5 | Point-to-Multipoint with leaf type 5 (TEMPORARY - registered 2024-08-27, extension registered 2026-08-06, expires 2027-08-27) | draft-ietf-pce-sr-p2mp-policy-11 |
| 6-244 | Unassigned | |
| 245-255 | Experimental Use | RFC 8779 |
GMPLS-CAPABILITY TLV Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 8779: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for GMPLS
- RFC 9756: Update to the IANA Path Communication Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers Registration Procedures and the Allowance of Experimental Error Codes
Available Formats
DISJOINTNESS-CONFIGURATION TLV Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 8800: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extension for Label Switched Path (LSP) Diversity Constraint Signaling
- RFC 9756: Update to the IANA Path Communication Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers Registration Procedures and the Allowance of Experimental Error Codes
Available Formats
SCHED-PD-LSP-ATTRIBUTE TLV Opt Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 8934: PCE Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Label Switched Path (LSP) Scheduling with Stateful PCE
- RFC 9756: Update to the IANA Path Communication Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers Registration Procedures and the Allowance of Experimental Error Codes
Available Formats
Schedule TLVs Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 8934: PCE Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Label Switched Path (LSP) Scheduling with Stateful PCE
- RFC 9756: Update to the IANA Path Communication Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers Registration Procedures and the Allowance of Experimental Error Codes
Available Formats
FLOWSPEC Object Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 9168: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extension for Flow Specification
- RFC 9756: Update to the IANA Path Communication Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers Registration Procedures and the Allowance of Experimental Error Codes
Available Formats
PCEP Flow Specification TLV Type Indicators
Reference
- RFC 9168: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extension for Flow Specification
Available Formats
| Range | Registration Procedures | Note |
|---|---|---|
| 0-255 | Reserved | Must not be allocated. Usage mirrors the BGP Flowspec registry. |
| 256-64506 | Specification Required | |
| 64507-65531 | First Come First Served | |
| 65532-65535 | Experimental Use |
| Value | Meaning | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0-255 | Reserved. Must not be allocated. Usage mirrors the BGP FlowSpec registry draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-27 and draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-19 | RFC 9168 |
| 256 | Route Distinguisher | RFC 9168 |
| 257 | IPv4 Multicast | RFC 9168 |
| 258 | IPv6 Multicast | RFC 9168 |
| 259-65531 | Unassigned | |
| 65532-65535 | Experimental Use | RFC 9168 |
Bidirectional LSP Association Group TLV Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 9059: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Associated Bidirectional Label Switched Paths (LSPs)
- RFC 9756: Update to the IANA Path Communication Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers Registration Procedures and the Allowance of Experimental Error Codes
Available Formats
PCECC-CAPABILITY sub-TLV
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 9050: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Procedures and Extensions for Using the PCE as a Central Controller (PCECC) of LSPs
- RFC 9756: Update to the IANA Path Communication Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers Registration Procedures and the Allowance of Experimental Error Codes
Available Formats
CCI Object Flag Field for MPLS Label
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 9050: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Procedures and Extensions for Using the PCE as a Central Controller (PCECC) of LSPs
- RFC 9756: Update to the IANA Path Communication Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers Registration Procedures and the Allowance of Experimental Error Codes
Available Formats
TE-PATH-BINDING TLV BT Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 9604: Carrying Binding Label/SID in PCE-Based Networks
- RFC 9756: Update to the IANA Path Communication Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers Registration Procedures and the Allowance of Experimental Error Codes
Available Formats
TE-PATH-BINDING TLV Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 9604: Carrying Binding Label/SID in PCE-Based Networks
- RFC 9756: Update to the IANA Path Communication Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers Registration Procedures and the Allowance of Experimental Error Codes
Available Formats
LSP-EXTENDED-FLAG TLV Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 9357: Label Switched Path (LSP) Object Flag Extension for Stateful PCE
- RFC 9756: Update to the IANA Path Communication Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers Registration Procedures and the Allowance of Experimental Error Codes
Available Formats
| Bit | Capability Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | GMPLS LSP (G) | RFC 9504 |
| 1 | Bidirectional Co-routed LSP (B) | RFC 9504 |
| 2-3 | Routing Granularity (RG) | RFC 9504 |
| 4 | Strict-Path Flag (O) | RFC-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-16 |
| 5-31 | Unassigned |
LSP Exclusion Subobject Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 9504: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Stateful PCE Usage in GMPLS-Controlled Networks
- RFC 9756: Update to the IANA Path Communication Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers Registration Procedures and the Allowance of Experimental Error Codes
Available Formats
| Bit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0-7 | Unassigned |
PCEP SRv6-ERO NAI Types
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 9603: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for IPv6 Segment Routing
Available Formats
SRv6-ERO Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 9603: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for IPv6 Segment Routing
- RFC 9756: Update to the IANA Path Communication Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers Registration Procedures and the Allowance of Experimental Error Codes
Available Formats
SRv6 Capability Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 9603: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for IPv6 Segment Routing
- RFC 9756: Update to the IANA Path Communication Element Protocol (PCEP) Numbers Registration Procedures and the Allowance of Experimental Error Codes
Available Formats
CCI Object Flag Field for Native IP
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 9757: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Native IP Networks
Available Formats
| Bit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0-15 | Unassigned |
BPI Object Status Code Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 9757: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Native IP Networks
Available Formats
BPI Object Error Code Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 9757: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Native IP Networks
Available Formats
BPI Object Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 9757: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Native IP Networks
Available Formats
| Bit | Meaning | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0-6 | Unassigned | |
| 7 | T (IP-in-IP) bit | RFC 9757 |
SR Policy Invalidation Operational Flags
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 9862: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Segment Routing (SR) Policy Candidate Paths
Available Formats
| Bit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0-6 | Unassigned | |
| 7 | D: Dropping - the LSP is actively dropping traffic as a result of Drop-Upon-Invalid behavior being activated. | RFC 9862 |
SR Policy Invalidation Configuration Flags
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 9862: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Segment Routing (SR) Policy Candidate Paths
Available Formats
| Bit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0-6 | Unassigned | |
| 7 | D: Drop enabled - the Candidate Path has Drop-Upon-Invalid feature enabled. | RFC 9862 |
SR Policy Capability TLV Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC 9862: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Segment Routing (SR) Policy Candidate Paths
Available Formats
PATH-MODIFICATION TLV Flag Field
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-16: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) extensions for Circuit Style Policies
Available Formats
| Bit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0-13 | Unassigned | |
| 14 | Permanent (P) | RFC-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-16 |
| 15 | Force (F) | RFC-ietf-pce-circuit-style-pcep-extensions-16 |
Flags in MULTIPATH-CAP TLV
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC-ietf-pce-multipath-29: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Signaling Multipath Information
Available Formats
| Bit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0-10 | Unassigned | |
| 11 | C-flag: Composite Candidate Path support | RFC-ietf-pce-multipath-29 |
| 12 | F-flag: MULTIPATH-FORWARD-CLASS TLV support | RFC-ietf-pce-multipath-29 |
| 13 | O-flag: MULTIPATH-OPPDIR-PATH TLV support | RFC-ietf-pce-multipath-29 |
| 14 | Unassigned | |
| 15 | W-flag: MULTIPATH-WEIGHT TLV support | RFC-ietf-pce-multipath-29 |
Flags in PATH-ATTRIB Object
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC-ietf-pce-multipath-29: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Signaling Multipath Information
Available Formats
| Bit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0-27 | Unassigned | |
| 28 | R-flag: Reverse path | RFC-ietf-pce-multipath-29 |
| 29-31 | O-flag: Operational state | RFC-ietf-pce-multipath-29 |
Flags in MULTIPATH-OPPDIR-PATH TLV
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC-ietf-pce-multipath-29: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Signaling Multipath Information
Available Formats
| Bit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0-13 | Unassigned | |
| 14 | L-flag: Link co-routed | RFC-ietf-pce-multipath-29 |
| 15 | N-flag: Node co-routed | RFC-ietf-pce-multipath-29 |
Flags in MULTIPATH-FORWARD-CLASS TLV
Registration Procedure(s)
- IETF Review
Reference
- RFC-ietf-pce-multipath-29: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Signaling Multipath Information
Available Formats
| Bit | Description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | T-flag: MPLS TC type | RFC-ietf-pce-multipath-29 |
| 1-28 | Unassigned | |
| 29-31 | FC: Forwarding class | RFC-ietf-pce-multipath-29 |